Forensic and Crime Psychology Research Group
  • Home
  • Members
  • News
    • Publications
    • Funding Success
    • Conferences / Events
    • Other
  • Research
    • Understanding Offending
    • Investigative & Courtroom
    • Public Attitudes
    • Forensic Practice
    • Service Evaluation
  • Consultancy
  • 🐦
  • Accessibility
Select Page

Investigative & Courtroom

Another expert area covered by key members of the FCRG concerns understanding bias, decision-making, investigative processes, and suchlike within courtroom and investigation settings. The areas include the biases that can affect witness testimonies, leading questions, line-up decisions, and ear-witness testimonies.

Recent published studies in this area include:

  • Kramer, R. S., Flanagan, E., Jones, A. L., & Gous, G. (2023). Wisdom of the inner crowd benefits both face and voice matching. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 37(6), 1409-1417.
  • Kramer, R. S., Gous, G., Mireku, M. O., & Ward, R. (2022). Metacognition during unfamiliar face matching. British Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 696-717.

  • Kramer, R. S., Jones, A. L., & Gous, G. (2021). Individual differences in face and voice matching abilities: The relationship between accuracy and consistency. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 35(1), 192-202.

  • Gous, G., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2020). Directive leading questions and preparation technique effects on witness accuracy. Sage Open, 10(1), 2158244019899053 – Open Access

  • Kramer, R. S., & Gous, G. (2020). Eyewitness descriptions without memory: The (f) utility of describing faces. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(3), 605-615.

Recent poster presentations related this area include:    

To replicate or conceal? Creating fairer lineups for multiple suspects with dissimilar distinctive features (Harris & Onwuegbusi, 2022)

  • X
  • RSS
Group Member Login
Viewing Message: 1 of 1.
Notice

We use cookies to understand how visitors use our website and to improve the user experience. To find out more, see our Cookies Policy.